Plot

The haunted Lambert family seeks to uncover the mysterious childhood secret that has left them dangerously connected to the spirit world.

Rating

Storyline
 
 
 
 
 


Acting
 
 
 
 
 


Directing
 
 
 
 
 


Cinematography
 
 
 
 
 


Costumes
 
 
 
 
 


Score
 
 
 
 
 


Overall
 
 
 
 
 


Film information

Genre: ,
 
Director:
 
Starring: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Studio:
 
Release date: Sep 13, 2013
 
MPAA rating: Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of terror and violence, and thematic elements
 
Official website: http://www.insidiousch2.com/
 
Runtime: 106 min
 
Movie Reviews:
  • 75
    Tampa Bay Times - by Steve Persall
    Wan in particular is pacing today's movie horror by reverting to the past. There's a touch of Hammer Films in his haunted house atmospheres, and Roger Corman in his groaning comic relief from the dread. ...read more

  • 70
    New York Magazine (Vulture) - by Bilge Ebiri
    Insidious: Chapter 2 may be somewhat uneven, but at a certain point near the end, I realized I hadn’t taken any notes during the second half. For all its weirdness, the film had utterly transported me. Bring on Chapter 3. ...read more

  • 63
    Chicago Sun-Times - by Sandy Cohen
    It offers a good dose of non-gory scares, tells a story of supernatural time travel that recalls elements of “Inception,” and pays homage to the genre Wan and Whannell love. ...read more

  • 63
    Chicago Tribune - by Michael Phillips
    The sequel's not bad; it's not slovenly. Some of the jolts are effectively staged and filmed, and Wan is getting better and better at figuring out what to do with the camera, and maneuvering actors within a shot for maximum suspense, while letting his design collaborators do the rest. But Leigh Whannell's script is a bit of a jumble. ...read more

  • 60
    The Telegraph - by Robbie Collin
    The scares are mostly very scary indeed, and that means the film does its job. ...read more

  • 58
    The A.V. Club - by Jesse Hassenger
    The techniques of the movie, then, are sound. Wan still moves his camera and composes his shots with a patience that belies his dank Saw origins. But the cinematography isn’t as virtuosic this time around. ...read more

  • 57
    Film.com - by William Goss
    Backtracking dilutes the few simple jolts that actually work. ...read more

  • 50
    RogerEbert.com - by Simon Abrams
    A puzzle movie with too many unnecessary pieces and not enough essential ones, but it's superior to its predecessor in a few basic ways. ...read more

  • 50
    The Globe and Mail (Toronto) - by Liam Lacey
    Continuing directly from where 2010’s "Insidious" left off, Insidious: Chapter 2 follows the further misfortunes of the Lambert family with diminishing insidious rewards. ...read more

  • 50
    San Francisco Chronicle - by Peter Hartlaub
    If Insidious 2 exists solely because Insidious 1 made a ton of money, then at least credit Wan for making quality control a priority. ...read more

  • 42
    Entertainment Weekly - by Chris Nashawaty
    Its lack of both originality and any real memorable moments feels shameless and lazy. Adding insult, the movie ends on a cliffhanger, guaranteeing that Insidious: Chapter 3 will soon be coming to a theater near you. ...read more

  • 40
    Total Film - by Mark Samuels
    "Poltergeist" goes "Back To The Future" with only passable results in a film whose activity is more par for the course than paranormal. ...read more

  • 40
    Arizona Republic - by Barbara VanDenburgh
    Except where “The Conjuring” invigorated horror-movie tropes with inventive application and strong characters, Insidious only wallows in them. ...

  • 40
    Los Angeles Times - by Robert Abele
    This busy-yet-dull sequel feels like Wan robotically flexing his manipulation of fright-film signposts, an exercise more silly than sinister. ...read more

  • 40
    New York Daily News - by Joe Neumaier
    Comes upon a few quirky solutions and movie-ripoff scares before settling into a kind of coma. ...read more

  • 38
    ReelViews - by James Berardinelli
    It is now weighed down by a second half that's equal parts incoherent, tedious, and repetitive. ...read more

  • 25
    New York Post - by Sara Stewart
    At the start of Insidious 2, a young woman opens her mouth to speak and someone else’s voice comes out of her. Demonic possession? Nope, just some inexplicable dubbing to kick off this clunker of a horror sequel. ...read more

  • 25
    USA Today - by Claudia Puig
    Insidious: Chapter 2 appears to be the sum of the unusable parts from James Wan's recent haunted house feature "The Conjuring." ...read more

  • 25
    Slant Magazine - by Chris Cabin
    A full realization of the very worst fears one could imagine when its director, James Wan, unexpectedly emerged from the torture-porn murk with its original, spiritedly directed predecessor. ...read more

  • 25
    The Playlist - by Charlie Schmidlin
    Why, besides a stellar opening weekend, does this extended narrative exist? ...read more

  • 20
    Village Voice - by Nick Schager
    Insidious Chapter 2 picks up where its predecessor left off-- in abject silliness. ...read more

  • 20
    The New York Times - by Jeannette Catsoulis
    A mess from start to finish — though, judging by the ending, this story won’t be over any time soon — Insidious: Chapter 2 is the kind of lazy, halfhearted product that gives scary movies a bad name. ...

  • 20
    Time Out London - by Nigel Floyd
    For all but the most forgiving horror fans, this is a lazy, stupid and incoherent failure. ...read more

Movie images
User Comments & Reviews

  1. Liana Shimunova

    Director James Wan and screenwriter Leigh Whannell generate some cool scares and clever comic relief from Elise’s junior colleagues, but a viewing of the first movie would benefit newbies.